<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Oscar Gilroy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://oscargilroy.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://oscargilroy.com</link>
	<description>In whatever you do, remember your last days, and you will never sin. - Book of Sirach</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 03:31:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Walking on Water: The Reality of Faith (Part 1) by James</title>
		<link>http://oscargilroy.com/2011/09/25/walking-on-water-part-1/#comment-109</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 03:31:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://oscargilroy.wordpress.com/?p=389#comment-109</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Excessive reasoning is contrary to faith. God is a Spirit, and He is unseen, so to speak. Consequently, faith is required in order for one to believe in God. Excessive reasoning convinces us that we have to see something or someone in order for them to exist. It&#039;s reasonable to reason. That&#039;s because we are fleshly, and we depend on our five senses and our ability to think logically and assess situations to make many of our decisions. However, being too logical with our thoughts will prevent us from achieving the levels of faith and breakthrough that God desires for us.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excessive reasoning is contrary to faith. God is a Spirit, and He is unseen, so to speak. Consequently, faith is required in order for one to believe in God. Excessive reasoning convinces us that we have to see something or someone in order for them to exist. It&#8217;s reasonable to reason. That&#8217;s because we are fleshly, and we depend on our five senses and our ability to think logically and assess situations to make many of our decisions. However, being too logical with our thoughts will prevent us from achieving the levels of faith and breakthrough that God desires for us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The First Time I Marched in a Protest&#8230; by Deepani Gilroy</title>
		<link>http://oscargilroy.com/2011/10/10/the-first-time-i-marched-in-a-protest/#comment-84</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Deepani Gilroy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 02:37:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://oscargilroy.wordpress.com/?p=428#comment-84</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for this post..when I was in Washington DC ..or New York..I felt God&quot;s grace everywhere...people must repent and pray...GOD is same yesterday, and today..His words never change. God likes friendship and team work rather than giving orders and arrogance..(He had a great friendship with Moses.)They were a team. He is the God who likes to be on the praises of throne to release his Many blessings!!! God wait to see how we treat him when we have little blessings. if we still be on his side that pleases him and then adding and filling the rest. That &quot;s God&quot;s nature . Abba father ..Bless all of your children again!!In the most holy &amp; righteous name of our Lord Jesus Christ Amen!!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this post..when I was in Washington DC ..or New York..I felt God&#8221;s grace everywhere&#8230;people must repent and pray&#8230;GOD is same yesterday, and today..His words never change. God likes friendship and team work rather than giving orders and arrogance..(He had a great friendship with Moses.)They were a team. He is the God who likes to be on the praises of throne to release his Many blessings!!! God wait to see how we treat him when we have little blessings. if we still be on his side that pleases him and then adding and filling the rest. That &#8220;s God&#8221;s nature . Abba father ..Bless all of your children again!!In the most holy &amp; righteous name of our Lord Jesus Christ Amen!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Nine days to go? by Deepanigilroy</title>
		<link>http://oscargilroy.com/2011/05/13/nine-days-to-go/#comment-71</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Deepanigilroy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 May 2011 08:33:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oscargilroy.com/?p=377#comment-71</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear Oscar,
        what Jesus predicts about the future will happen :) Signs are here in this world.But the end is not yet.
              
                 with love
                         Mummy]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Oscar,<br />
        what Jesus predicts about the future will happen <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  Signs are here in this world.But the end is not yet.</p>
<p>                 with love<br />
                         Mummy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Blessing and a Curse: Embarrassing the Faith after bin Laden&#8217;s death by James</title>
		<link>http://oscargilroy.com/2011/05/04/a-blessing-and-a-curse-embarrassing-the-faith-after-bin-ladens-death/#comment-69</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2011 21:51:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://oscargilroy.wordpress.com/2011/05/04/a-blessing-and-a-curse-embarrassing-the-faith-after-bin-ladens-death/#comment-69</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Amen.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Quid Est Veritas? by James</title>
		<link>http://oscargilroy.com/2011/04/21/quid-est-veritas/#comment-68</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2011 11:31:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://oscargilroy.wordpress.com/?p=334#comment-68</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No offense taken ... but I believe that my secular worldview can lead to a value system that is remarkably similar to yours.  It is true that we have some fundamental differences of opinion, but on the balance I think that we&#039;ve come to some pretty similar conclusions regarding how one should lead a moral life.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No offense taken &#8230; but I believe that my secular worldview can lead to a value system that is remarkably similar to yours.  It is true that we have some fundamental differences of opinion, but on the balance I think that we&#8217;ve come to some pretty similar conclusions regarding how one should lead a moral life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Quid Est Veritas? by oscargilroy</title>
		<link>http://oscargilroy.com/2011/04/21/quid-est-veritas/#comment-67</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[oscargilroy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2011 02:22:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://oscargilroy.wordpress.com/?p=334#comment-67</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s not hard when I&#039;m plotting your demise as we speak... ;)

Seriously, yes, it&#039;s hard to do.  The fundamental stumbling block that I see - with respect to... everything - is almost that we live in completely separate worlds, a largely secular one, and one colored by the particulars of the Catholic faith (I hope you know I don&#039;t mean that in any way to offend you). On so many things you say, I have a reaction against them because of where I stand, which is somewhat like an opposite shore. There are so many premises that I accept - belief in God as proclaimed in the Bible and through the Church, and the authority of that Church to proclaim His teaching - without which most of what I say is hard to swallow.

As my own aside, I know I don&#039;t hold the words or magical knowledge to change yours or anyone else&#039;s mind on anything, but I do appreciate your willingness to hear me out. I&#039;m not 100% clear on the good that comes out of it yet, but it beats most internet discussions I&#039;ve been a part of by a long mile.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not hard when I&#8217;m plotting your demise as we speak&#8230; <img src='http://s1.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Seriously, yes, it&#8217;s hard to do.  The fundamental stumbling block that I see &#8211; with respect to&#8230; everything &#8211; is almost that we live in completely separate worlds, a largely secular one, and one colored by the particulars of the Catholic faith (I hope you know I don&#8217;t mean that in any way to offend you). On so many things you say, I have a reaction against them because of where I stand, which is somewhat like an opposite shore. There are so many premises that I accept &#8211; belief in God as proclaimed in the Bible and through the Church, and the authority of that Church to proclaim His teaching &#8211; without which most of what I say is hard to swallow.</p>
<p>As my own aside, I know I don&#8217;t hold the words or magical knowledge to change yours or anyone else&#8217;s mind on anything, but I do appreciate your willingness to hear me out. I&#8217;m not 100% clear on the good that comes out of it yet, but it beats most internet discussions I&#8217;ve been a part of by a long mile.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Quid Est Veritas? by James</title>
		<link>http://oscargilroy.com/2011/04/21/quid-est-veritas/#comment-66</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2011 00:32:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://oscargilroy.wordpress.com/?p=334#comment-66</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As an aside, I appreciate that we can have a thoughtful and reasoned discussion on this issue and ultimately disagree in a respectful fashion.  That&#039;s difficult to do.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As an aside, I appreciate that we can have a thoughtful and reasoned discussion on this issue and ultimately disagree in a respectful fashion.  That&#8217;s difficult to do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Quid Est Veritas? by James</title>
		<link>http://oscargilroy.com/2011/04/21/quid-est-veritas/#comment-65</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2011 00:29:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://oscargilroy.wordpress.com/?p=334#comment-65</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Priests can leave the priesthood.  Hetero couples can get married.  What option to gay folks have? 

I think that our fundamental stumbling block with respect to my racism analogy is the differing degree to which we are able to separate one&#039;s sexual preference from actual sexual practices.  I think that the two are inseparable.   In my humble opinion gay people should not have to curb what for heterosexuals is viewed to be a totally natural biological impulse so that they can stay within the good graces of a church.  I&#039;d suggest that gays, like heterosexual folks, should save physical intimacy for committed relationships but I find it cruel and unrealistic to suggest that they should altogether suppress their sexuality.   Indeed, I think doing so causes profound psychological damage.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Priests can leave the priesthood.  Hetero couples can get married.  What option to gay folks have? </p>
<p>I think that our fundamental stumbling block with respect to my racism analogy is the differing degree to which we are able to separate one&#8217;s sexual preference from actual sexual practices.  I think that the two are inseparable.   In my humble opinion gay people should not have to curb what for heterosexuals is viewed to be a totally natural biological impulse so that they can stay within the good graces of a church.  I&#8217;d suggest that gays, like heterosexual folks, should save physical intimacy for committed relationships but I find it cruel and unrealistic to suggest that they should altogether suppress their sexuality.   Indeed, I think doing so causes profound psychological damage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Quid Est Veritas? by oscargilroy</title>
		<link>http://oscargilroy.com/2011/04/21/quid-est-veritas/#comment-64</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[oscargilroy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 22:26:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://oscargilroy.wordpress.com/?p=334#comment-64</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It may be difficult to understand, but celibacy is practiced by the vast majority of Roman Catholic priests, and is the expectation laid upon every unmarried individual. If nothing else, at least understand that it&#039;s not a swipe against one particular group. 

Even on the basis of the connection you make, I still don&#039;t see a clear similarity between racism - which aims necessarily to denigrate and harm a group - and the position that sexual acts are only suitable within the context of a male-female marriage. Holding the latter position in no way impacts my feelings towards homosexuals that I encounter. Do I disapprove of the behavior to which they are strongly inclined? Of course. But if I were to have feelings similar to those of a racist against everyone who simply did something I didn&#039;t think was right, I&#039;d hate everyone, including myself. 

Judging a behavior is not the same as judging a person. And accepting and loving an individual is not the same as extending approval - active or tacit - to every desire and behavior they exhibit. Almost everyone draws a line that limits what range of sexual activity and inclination they consider morally acceptable. It just happens that at this time and in this country, where you&#039;ve drawn the line seems reasonable and in tune with the majority opinion of American culture, whereas mine seems dogmatic and unreasonable.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It may be difficult to understand, but celibacy is practiced by the vast majority of Roman Catholic priests, and is the expectation laid upon every unmarried individual. If nothing else, at least understand that it&#8217;s not a swipe against one particular group. </p>
<p>Even on the basis of the connection you make, I still don&#8217;t see a clear similarity between racism &#8211; which aims necessarily to denigrate and harm a group &#8211; and the position that sexual acts are only suitable within the context of a male-female marriage. Holding the latter position in no way impacts my feelings towards homosexuals that I encounter. Do I disapprove of the behavior to which they are strongly inclined? Of course. But if I were to have feelings similar to those of a racist against everyone who simply did something I didn&#8217;t think was right, I&#8217;d hate everyone, including myself. </p>
<p>Judging a behavior is not the same as judging a person. And accepting and loving an individual is not the same as extending approval &#8211; active or tacit &#8211; to every desire and behavior they exhibit. Almost everyone draws a line that limits what range of sexual activity and inclination they consider morally acceptable. It just happens that at this time and in this country, where you&#8217;ve drawn the line seems reasonable and in tune with the majority opinion of American culture, whereas mine seems dogmatic and unreasonable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Quid Est Veritas? by James</title>
		<link>http://oscargilroy.com/2011/04/21/quid-est-veritas/#comment-63</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 18:32:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://oscargilroy.wordpress.com/?p=334#comment-63</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I find it extremely difficult to accept the proposition that folks like my sister should attempt to reign in something that is at the core of their being, much the same way that I find it difficult to understand the notion that priest&#039;s should remain celibate.  It&#039;s seems a bit academic to suggest that the church doesn&#039;t condone homosexuals, just homosexual acts.  

Regarding the comparisons to racism, there were many folks who justified their racist beliefs on notions that blacks were genetically inferior and predisposed to engage in certain behaviors deemed to be socially unacceptable.  The comparison doesn&#039;t require as much of a leap as you believe.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find it extremely difficult to accept the proposition that folks like my sister should attempt to reign in something that is at the core of their being, much the same way that I find it difficult to understand the notion that priest&#8217;s should remain celibate.  It&#8217;s seems a bit academic to suggest that the church doesn&#8217;t condone homosexuals, just homosexual acts.  </p>
<p>Regarding the comparisons to racism, there were many folks who justified their racist beliefs on notions that blacks were genetically inferior and predisposed to engage in certain behaviors deemed to be socially unacceptable.  The comparison doesn&#8217;t require as much of a leap as you believe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

